(00:00:00) The police arrested Aihe serial killer "Killing 2 Orioles in 5 Days"! 8 months later, an old woman living alone was arrested because of "DNA"?
In 2003, a "serial killer" appeared in Kaohsiung's Love River. In just one week, he strangled two sex workers and robbed them of their finances. Moreover, he is very courageous. He targets sex workers who live in the same building. He dares to commit crimes consecutively in the same place, which means he does not take the police seriously at all! Another fatality! It was only three days since the last murder, and the place where the second victim was killed was in the room directly opposite the first victim. This gangster is really too arrogant! Why was he so sure that the police wouldn't catch him? Although the crime scene was a sub-rented apartment on the second floor of Tuotiancuo, it had an independent entrance and exit, and there were no monitors installed. Therefore, even if the landlord lived on the first floor, he could not figure out who was there. In and out. Although the police found many DNA biological traces in the deceased's room, because the deceased's contacts were too complicated, they could not find the owner of these DNAs at the first time. Even if the DNA was compared, there was no way to prove this. The owner of the DNA is the murderer. The case is in a stalemate. As long as this serial murderer is not arrested for a day, not only the local sex workers are worried, but also the nearby residents are frightened, because they don't know when this murderer hiding in the dark will show up again. Crime again!
(00:47:28) During the Mid-Autumn Festival, I received a call from a kidnapper demanding a ransom of one million! There is a grievance to be redressed. The blue plastic bucket cannot float out of the Tamsui River!
I received a call from a kidnapper during the Mid-Autumn Festival! The ransom is one million! Cement worker in emergency: Kidnapped the wrong person? How can you pick my son if you have no money?
Will the hostage withdraw the money himself? The child is naughty and directs and acts on his own?
Did the kidnappers deliberately imitate the hostages to withdraw money? Father Li was also deceived!
Friend kills you! Fill the bucket with cement and suffocate him to death! There is a grievance to be redressed! A blue plastic bucket that won’t float out of the Tamsui River!
The key to converting the death penalty to life imprisonment in the second instance! Never leave your Buddhist beads! An innocent soul seeking his life in broad daylight?
Paroled and released from prison: ordained and became a monk to pay off his mistakes
(01:35:03) The suspect surrendered? Can you be enlightened even if you refuse to admit guilt? The suspect escaped death: After being released from prison, he wrote the book "Confessions of a Murderer" to make a fortune
Educability is the most commonly heard reason for judges not to impose the death penalty, but who determines educability? If a murderer can completely overturn his confession, he will not even admit to the crime of murder, and he will not regret it, but But the judge insists that this person can be enlightened, so he changes the sentence from death to life imprisonment. Do you accept this reason for the sentence? We continue to follow the Huashan dismemberment case that occurred in 2018, and the case is now in the first instance of appeal. The lawyer for the victim's family found that Chen Boqian's appraisal was flawed. The "static scale" and "dynamic scale" that should have been completed, but only the "static scale" were completed, so Chen Boqian was determined to have "moderate possibility of indoctrination." Some of the so-called static scales consider the defendant's previous academic experience or criminal records. Therefore, identification is beneficial to the defendant. However, part of the dynamic scale considers the current state and Chen Boqian's attitude after committing the crime. With his current attitude, not only does he have no regrets, but he also blames all the crimes on a person named Eric. How could such a person be considered a criminal? There are educated ones. The lawyer said that at that time, the collegial panel asked the appraiser whether he could make a new dynamic scale. The appraiser said "yes", so everyone thought that the collegial panel was going to make a new dynamic scale. Unexpectedly, on September 8 this year, the verdict was upheld indefinitely. imprisonment. The prosecutor thought it was too outrageous and has filed an appeal.
台灣啟示錄
コメント